McGinnis v. Cayton
West Virginia Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceHarshbarger, Justice
I concur in the majority result but not in its limited scope. The opinion works an injustice “in the name of the law,” ignores equitable principles, and hurts hundreds of West Virginia landowners.
Research and experience teach that the McGinnis lease’s type of royalty provision — a fractional interest in oil production and a flat rate payment per gas well — was typical in old oil and gas leases.1 See, for example, excerpted lease provisions in Lovett v. Eastern Oil Co., 68 W.Va. 667, 70 S.E. 707 (1911), and South Penn Oil Co. v. Snodgrass, 71 W.Va. 438, 76 S.E. 961 (1931). See generally,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- George Backer Management Corp. v. Acme Quilting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Richard W. Shear v. The National Rifle Association of America, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Campbell Soup Co. v. LojeskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.