Legal Opinion

Paul Courter Holland v. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 2, 1964No. 19292_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Paul Holland wants out from the Oregon State Penitentiary, where he is presently confined under a twenty-year sentence for rape, and a five-year sentence for burglary. By this, and other actions, he has challenged the validity of his confinement. Federal relief has uniformly been denied on the ground that, in any event, he is validly confined under the five-year sentence, which he concededly has never attacked. See McNally v. Hill, 293 U.S. 131, 55 S.Ct. 24, 79 L.Ed. 238 (1934).

He now seeks an order directing the state court to expunge the record of his conviction on the rape charge. But even…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden Oregon State Penitentiary v. Paul Courter HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Amos Marshall Arketa v. Lawrence E. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. Samuel D. Collins v. John H. Klinger, Warden, Etc., (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API