Legal Opinion

Essex v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 19, 1969No. 2 Div. 7PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing

CATES, Judge.

On rehearing Essex asks the meaning our cryptic “Affirmed (No Op.),” pronounced August 19, 1969 on his coram nobis appeal. “Affirm,” according to Black’s Law Dictionary, means:

“In the practice of appellate courts, to affirm a judgment, decree, or order, is to declare that it is valid and right, and must stand as rendered below; to ratify and reassert it; to concur in its correctness and confirm its efficacy. Boner v. Fall River County Bank, 25 Wyo. 260, 168 P. 726, 727.”

We affirmed the judgment of the Marengo Circuit Court because of Supreme Court Rule 50, which reads:

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crook v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Boner v. Fall River County BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Ex Parte v. MerkesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Shepard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  3. Cooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  4. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API