Legal Opinion

Estate of Canale v. Binghamton Amusement Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1975PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*877Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Given this court’s restricted scope of review, when issues of fact have been resolved by affirmance at the Appellate Division, the findings are conclusive on this court, if there is evidence to support them (see, generally, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, pp 453-455). True, the proof of the cause of the fire rested on slender inference, and the proof of value of the Canale property was hardly inspiring of confidence, nevertheless there was some evidence on each issue, even if only barely…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mighty Midgets, Inc. v. Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Marine Midland Bank v. John E. Russo Produce Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Schubtex, Inc. v. Allen Snyder, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Reilly v. DiBiancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Mead v. BloomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API