Booker v. Smith
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before .Hudson, J., Abbeville, January, 1892. In these two cases, Henry A. Meetze, Esq., sat in the stead of Mr. Justice McGowan, disqualified by relationship to defendant. Actions by Edward H. Booker against Augustus W. Smith, commenced in May, 1891, to recover on attachment bonds executed by defendant in the two cases of Wage tier v. Booker and Watkins & Davenport v. Booker.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion, of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Meetze.
These cases involve the same questions, and are precisely the same in every particular, except that in one of them the name of Augustus W. Smith, the respondent, has a seal after it, while in the other it has not. They were, therefore, heard together. In order that a proper understanding may be had of the points decided, it is necessary that one of the complaints should be set out in full:
Edward H. Booker, the plaintiff herein, by Graydon & Graydon, his attorneys, complaining of Augustus W. Smith, the defendant aforesaid, alleges:
I.…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Larscheid v. KittellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Marshall Bros. Furniture Co., Inc. v. DrawdySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Summerton Live Stock Co. v. EarlySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918