Legal Opinion
Cain v. Rinehart
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 1, 2022No. 4:19-cv-11278Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DERRICK CAIN, Plaintiff, Case No. 19-cv-11278 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. BRIAN RINEHART, et al., Defendants. __________________________________________________________________/ ORDER (1) ADOPTING RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 54), (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 43), AND (3) TERMINATING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DETERMINE SUFFICIENCY OF DEFENDANT’S DISCOVERY RESPONSES (ECF No. 53) AS MOOT In this action, Plaintiff Derrick Cain alleges that Defendant Brian…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Showtime Networks Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ge American Communications, Inc., Intervenor. Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ge American Communications, Inc., Intervenor. New Heritage Acquisition Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ge American Communications, Inc., Intervenor. Ge American Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Southern Satellite Systems, Inc. And New Heritage Acquisition Corp., Intervenors. Ge American Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Showtime Networks Inc. And New Heritage Acquisition Corp., Intervenors. Showtime Networks Inc. And Viacom International Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ge American Communications, Inc., the Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc. And New Heritage Acquisition Corp., Intervenors. Viacom International Inc. And Showtime Networks Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ge American Communications, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991