In Re the Welfare of J.W.K.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
This is a state’s pretrial appeal from a suppression order in a juvenile delinquency proceeding. The juvenile’s attorney successfully argued in the district court that the court should suppress both the DNA test results on a blood sample linking the suspect to the crime scene and a confession he gave after being confronted with the identification evidence. The court of appeals affirmed, concluding that the police needed additional consent or, failing that, a new sample obtained pursuant to a search warrant, before using the youth’s blood sample in connection with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. LicariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. NetlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.