Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of J.W.K.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 27, 1998No. CX-97-1696PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

This is a state’s pretrial appeal from a suppression order in a juvenile delinquency proceeding. The juvenile’s attorney successfully argued in the district court that the court should suppress both the DNA test results on a blood sample linking the suspect to the crime scene and a confession he gave after being confronted with the identification evidence. The court of appeals affirmed, concluding that the police needed additional consent or, failing that, a new sample obtained pursuant to a search warrant, before using the youth’s blood sample in connection with…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State v. LicariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. State v. NetlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API