Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided February 12, 1998No. 06-97-00076-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. After the jury awarded Whlimenia Richardson $75,150.00 damages in her slip-and-fali/negligence cause of action, the trial court granted Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Richardson appeals and requests that we reinstate the jury’s verdict. We affirm the judgment.

On September 25, 1994, while Richardson was in a Wal-Mart store, she slipped and fell on a puddle of Spray ⅛ Wash on the store’s floor. She did not see the puddle before her fall. Afterwards, she spoke…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Mancorp, Inc. v. CULPEPPEERTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Havner v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ellis County State Bank v. KeeverTexas Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. MacIas v. Fiesta Mart, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  2. Aquila Southwest Pipeline, Inc. v. Harmony Exploration, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  3. Strauss v. Continental Airlines, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Tinsley, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  5. Knorpp v. Hale, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API