Kingan & Co. v. Orem
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Tipton Oircu.it Court; J. F. Elliott, Judge. Action by Kingan & Oo. against William Orem and others. Erom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.
Appellant’s complaint against Orem, Chapman, and Gwinn is in two paragraphs. The first paragraph seeks to recover from Gwinn the value of a stock of goods sold to him by Orem & Chapman, on the ground that the goods were sold in bulk without complying with the act of 1901 (Acts 1901, p. 505, §§1, 2, §§6637a, 6637b Burns 1901) regulating sales in bulk. The second paragraph avers that on August 26, 1901, Orem & Chapman, as partners, were engaged in a retail grocery and meat business; that the firm was indebted to appellant $141.69 for goods sold and delivered to the firm at its request; that on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McKinster v. SagerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Sellers v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Plunkett v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Strong v. DanielIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
- Wheeler v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kundred v. BitlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
- Newell, Admr. v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1938