Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. Amos

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 9, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, C.J.

— The material and controlling facts in this ease are that C. W. Tinsley transmitted his cheek for $2,-000.00 to Commercial National Bank of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, to meet his note for $2,000.00 which was about to mature at said Bank. The check was drawn on Flagler Bank & Trust Company of Miami, Florida. Commercial National Bank mailed the check direct to Flagler Bank & Trust Company for payment. Tinsley did not have sufficient money on deposit to pay the check. Commercial National Bank was notified that payment was refused because of insufficient funds. Tinsley was notified. Flagler Bank &…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bryan, as Admrx. Coconut Grove Bank Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. City of Miami a Municipal Corp. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  3. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  4. Morton v. WooleryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Amos v. BairdSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carl v. Republic Security BankDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
  2. First State Trust & Savings Bank v. TherrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Grillo v. CITY NAT. BANK OF MIAMIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Tunnicliffe, as Liqdr. v. SearsSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Hart and Troy v. SavarySupreme Court of Florida · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API