Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thomas v. Hawkins

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1895No. 1,231Published

Prom the Marion Superior Court.

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Gavin, J.

The opinion of the majority, if I correctly understand it, holds that after demurrer sustained to a complaint, it is discretionary with the court to refuse to permit the filing of an amended complaint which pleads the same facts, causing damage, as were set forth in the original complaint, recovery being sought in tort instead of in contract. With this conclusion I am unable to agree.

The statute, sections 397-399, R. S. 1894 (sections 394-396, R. S. 1881), gives the court a discretion in allowing amendments made after answer, amendments as to parties, to conform…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Reeder v. . SayreNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Potter v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. Cobb, Christy & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Culp v. SteereSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. Ewing v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API