Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Omaha Girls Club, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 25, 1988No. 86-1447PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

The petition for rehearing en banc has been considered by the court and is denied by reason of the lack of majority of active judges voting to rehear the case en banc.1

2DissentLay, Chief Judge, joined by Heaney and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges,

I dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc. This case presents one of the most important issues we have faced in several years. It is clearly one of “exceptional importance” under Fed.R.App.P. 35(a). Because a majority of the active judges has failed to vote to hear this case en banc, I file this dissent.

The Omaha Girls Club’s termination of its arts and crafts teacher because of…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. 46 Fair empl.prac.cas. 117, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,856 Crystal Chambers, in Her Own Behalf and in Behalf of Her Minor Daughter, Ruth Chambers v. The Omaha Girls Club, Inc., a Nebraska CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API