Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 8, 1998No. Nos. 98-B-0619, 98-B-0620PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

These consolidated attorney disciplinary proceedings arise from the filing of two sets of formal charges by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Joe L. Smith, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana. The charges allege respondent violated Rules 1.3 (lack of due diligence), 1.4 (failure to comply with reasonable requests for information), 1.15(b) (failure to refund and account for client funds), 1.16(d) (failure to protect client interests upon termination of representation), 3.2 (failure to make…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re ParkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. In re CaverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  3. In re WelckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  4. In re FerrandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re LetellierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  2. In re CollinsworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  3. In re WatleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  4. In Re GibsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  5. In re CohenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API