Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Burlington Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1912No. 236PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is an action to recover penalties under a statute of North Carolina for refusal to. receive goods for shipment. As the statute is the same that was held bad, so far as it concerns commerce among the States, in Southern Railway Co. v. Reid, 222 U. S. 424, and Southern Railway Co v. Reid & Beam, 222 U. S. 444, a short statement will be enough. On January 26, 1907, the Burlington Lumber Company tendered to the Railway Company at Burlington, North Carolina, certain machinery for .shipment to Saginaw, Michigan, on á through bill of lading. Saginaw was not on the Railway Company’s line, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. BeamSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People of Porto Rico v. American R.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1918
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Jeans v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. West India & Panama Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API