Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. Carpenter

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 5, 1943PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStuRtevant, J.

This is a bill for specific performance. A hearing was had, findings of fact made and filed and a decree was entered for the plaintiff. The case is here upon the defendants’ exceptions. From the findings appear the following facts material to the questions presented.

The defendants, Frank O. Carpenter and George M. Carpenter, are brothers. On July 24, 1941, they gave to the plaintiff a written option in words and figures as follows:

“For and in consideration of One Hundred dollars, to us in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, we hereby grant unto Ruth A. Acker-man, an option…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adams v. MessingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Durfee House Furnishing Co. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  3. Hill v. BellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Toys, Inc. v. F.M. Burlington Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Morrisseau v. FayetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. Ziegler Furniture & Funeral Home, Inc. v. CicmanecSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. Bixler v. BullardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API