Legal Opinion

Arsht v. Hatton

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1948No. 6774PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGRANERY, District Judge.

This is a motion for a summary judgment, which raises a clear-cut issue of law: has a judgment which has been appealed from after actual trial been “finally determined” within the meaning of a condition in an insurance contract?

Plaintiff originally brought suit for damages sustained in an automobile accident and received a verdict and judgment for $6,500. Defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. or for .a new trial was denied, and within the time allowed by law an appeal was taken to the Circuit Court of Appeals. jThe bond for cost of appeal was filed, but a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  3. Cold Metal Process Co. v. McLouth Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  4. Ferguson v. Manufacturers' Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Di Gregorio v. Skinner, (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crowley v. Hardman Bros.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  2. Dixon v. DoddDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Larson v. Dauphin Realty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API