Legal Opinion

Ark. State Highway Commission v. Union Planters National Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 9, 1960No. 5-2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

The appellees have filed a motion asking us to modify our original holding to the extent of taxing the costs of appeal against the Highway Commission. It is contended that the assessment of any costs against the landowner in a condemnation proceeding would deprive him of his constitutional right to full compensation for his land.

It is true that when the only issue in a case of this kind is the value of the land the owner should not be compelled to pay the costs of a proceeding brought for the purpose of taking his property. Nichols on Eminent Domain (3d Ed.), § 4.109. But this rule does not…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dade County Board of Public Instruction v. Baldwin, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1962
  2. Housing Authority v. AmslerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API