Legal Opinion

United States v. Aversa

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided April 29, 1991No. 1:90-cr-00001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LOUGHLIN, District Judge.

The defendants were convicted in this court of charges relating to the structuring of currency transactions to avoid the filing of a Currency Transaction Report.

After this court had ruled on several preliminary motions, Mr. Aversa pled guilty to one count of structuring a currency transaction to avoid the reporting laws, but retained the right to appeal certain questions of law. Mr. Mentó was convicted after a jury trial.

Mr. Mentó has asked this court to set aside his conviction in light of the recent Supreme Court decision in Cheek v. United States,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. Waldemar Ratzlaf, United States of America v. Loretta RatzlafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. SawyerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  4. United States v. a Certain Parcel of Land, MoultonboroDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
  5. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API