Legal Opinion
Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Dan Paulson Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 8, 2006No. 55342-9-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
¶1 This case arises from an arbitration claim brought by Joseph and Karen Martinelli against Dan Paul-son Construction, Inc. (Paulson), for alleged construction defects in the Martinellis’ home. Paulson’s commercial liability insurance company, Mutual of Enumclaw (MOE), agreed to defend Paulson under a reservation of rights regarding coverage issues. Before Paulson and the Martinellis commenced arbitration, MOE filed a declaratory judgment action and issued a subpoena duces tecum and interrogatories to the arbitrator seeking information that would help MOE determine which parts of any…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Smith v. Safeco Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Smith v. Safeco InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Truck Ins. Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Dan Paulson Construction, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- MOE INS. CO. v. Dan Paulson Const., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Moun & Aung Keodalah v. Allstate Insurance Company And Tracey SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. T & G CONST., INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. T&G Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007