Locke v. Andrasko

(dissenting) — I dissent from so much of the prevailing opinion as affirms the judgment respecting the Chopeck heirs who attained majority more than six years prior to the institution of this action. The statute and our decisions governing the matter are set out in the original opinion in 175 Wash. 123, 26 P. (2d) 1046, and are disregarded in this decision.

The judgment should be reversed as to them, and modified accordingly.

Blake and G-eraghty, JJ., concur with Holcomb, J.