Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Chung

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 27, 1981No. FILE NO. 911PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

The defendants have appealed from a judgment awarding the plaintiff insurer a sum equal to that paid to the defendants by another insurer for a loss incurred in a fire for which the plaintiffs had also compensated the defendants. The facts as found by the trial court are as follows: The plaintiff insurance company insured the defendants against loss by fire to their home. On July 1, 1974, a fire occurred when an employee of Action Carpentry, who was installing a new countertop in the defendants’ kitchen, allowed a container of volatile adhesive to ignite, causing considerable property damage.

T…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Providence Electric Co. v. Sutton Place, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  4. Franks v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Cecio Bros. v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Westchester Fire Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Wasko v. ManellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Pullman, Comley, Bradley & ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Fuller v. Stonewall Cas. Co. of W. Va.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Amica Mutual Insurance v. BartonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API