State Ex Rel. McGann v. Evatt

By the Court.

Although the members of the Board of Tax Appeals and the Civil Service Commission are named as respondents, the brief of counsel for relator presents no question of law arising from the allegations as to those two bodies.

These three questions are propounded in the brief for relator: First, did the respondent Tax Commissioner have any legal right to supplant the relator with Maddux through the device of calling him a deputy? Second, was there really a‘consolidation of positions for the purpose of economy and was relator’s position abolished in good faith as a result thereof, or…