Legal Opinion

Pack v. Thompson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 24, 1915No. 2537PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California; Benjamin F. Bledsoe, Judge. Suit in equity by E. Thompson against Thomas W. Pack, Stella Schuler, and Joseph K. Hutchinson. From an order denying a motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

In the present suit the plaintiff prayed for and obtained an injunction pendente lite restraining and enjoining the defendants from in any manner taking any steps towards forfeiting the plaintiff’s right, title, and interest in and to 44 certain placer mining claims, particularly set forth and described in the complaint as claims Nos. 1 to 31, inclusive, 48 to 50, inclusive, 67, 70, 73, 86, 92, 93, 113, 114, 130, and 218, situate upon Searles Borax Fake, San Bernardino county, Cal.

All of such claims are included in the 175 claims involved in case No. 2535, 223 Fed.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
  2. Pack v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  3. Pack v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pack v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  2. Pack v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API