Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Faulkenbury

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 28, 1994No. CA 93-1031PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James R. Cooper, Judge.

The decedent in this life insurance case, Joyce Blankenship, was murdered on November 20, 1990. At the time of her death she had in force a policy issued by John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company which designated James Guss, her son, as beneficiary of 75 percent of the proceeds, and the appellee, Charles Faulkenbury, as beneficiary of 25 percent of the proceeds. Mr. Guss assigned a portion of his expected proceeds from the policy to Callison-Lough Funeral Service. In September 1991, Mr. Guss was convicted of murdering the insured, and was therefore disqualified from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. ShaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Linda Elenia Askew Trust v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Moore v. Columbia Mutual Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  4. American Foundation Life Insurance v. WamplerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Heirs of Mills v. WylieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fryer v. BoyettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Carolina Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Nunnenman v. Estate of GrubbsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Lee v. BolanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Abc, Inc. v. Nameloc, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API