Legal Opinion
Fitzgerald v. Reardon
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided February 28, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 11410PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEN, Chancellor.
Plaintiffs are registered Democratic voters who are active in the internal affairs of *184their political party. They claim in their complaint to be the duly constituted delegates and alternates from the 8th representative district to the State Democratic Convention which is scheduled to be held on March 3,1990. They complain that they will be illegally excluded from that meeting because defendant Joseph Reardon, chairperson of the New Castle County Democratic Committee, has refused to certify them as delegates to the State Democratic Committee.
The dispute between these…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Democratic Party of United States v. Wisconsin Ex Rel. La FolletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baird v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cousins v. WigodaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ivanhoe Partners v. Newmont Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Emerald Partners v. BerlinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1997
- Cochran v. SupinskiCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2001
- windsor republican committee v. state republican partyVermont Superior Court · 2024