Legal Opinion

&198tna Life Ins. Co. v. Roberts

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1935No. 31898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

The appellee was plaintiff in the court below and filed suit upon a policy of life insurance issued by the appellant to recover disability benefits provided for under said policy which contained what is commonly called a “total and permanent disability” clause, reading as follows:

“Permanent Total Disability Provision. If before default in payment of premium, the insured becomes totally and permanently disabled by bodily injuries or disease and is thereby prevented from performing any work or conducting any business for compensation or profit, the following benefits will be available;
“When…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hope Spoke Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Berry v. Lamar Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  3. New York Life Ins v. AlexanderMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Mauk v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Casualty Company v. WhiteheadMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Aetna Life Insurance Co. of Hartford v. DurwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Cox v. Lamar Life InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. LindseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Franklin Like Ins. v. StriblingMississippi Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API