Legal Opinion

Scott v. Russell

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 15, 1848PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This was a libel in personam, by John Scott, against William H. Bussell, master of the ship Niagara, to recover for seamen's wages. It appeared that the libellant, a resident of Liverpool, shipped, at the port of New York, on board the Niagara, as cook, for a voyage to Liverpool and back, and earned wages on the voyage.

Read the full summary

This was a libel in personam, by John Scott, against William H. Bussell, master of the ship Niagara, to recover for seamen's wages. It appeared that the libellant, a resident of Liverpool, shipped, at the port of New York, on board the Niagara, as cook, for a voyage to Liverpool and back, and earned wages on the voyage. In defence it was shown, that while the vessel was yet in New York, he carried on board of her, clandestinely, a large package of tobacco, two feet long and ten inches wide, crowded full. It was also proved, that on the arrival of the ship in Liverpool, forty or fifty pounds…

1Opinion of the Court

BETTS, District Judge.

It is sufficiently proved that the libellant clandestinely carried on board the vessel in New York a considerable quantity of tobacco, and that, immediately on the arrival of the vessel in Liverpool, a very similar quantity was found secreted under the caboose occupied by him as cook. This is, I think, sufficient evidence that he took on board the tobacco there detected, and that his misconduct caused the arrest of the vessel. If it were the fact, as suggested by counsel, that there were two distinct parcels of tobacco discovered, it would not have been difficult for the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oldfield v. FairfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API