Legal Opinion
Zorn v. McParland
The Superior Court of New York City
Decided April 15, 1894Published
Trial by the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdams, J.
This is an action at law by the plaintiff, the vendee, in a contract for the purchase of real estate, against the vendor therein, to recover $750, a deposit made by the plaintiff at the time of the execution of the contract, and also the sum of $278, paid by him for examining the title, which was rejected by the vendee’s lawyer, on the ground of the existence of certain incumbrances affecting the title which, it is alleged, disabled plaintiff from carrying out the sale.
The contract was to have been closed on May 10, 1892; but the time was extended for the accommodation of the plaintiff to May…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moore v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Bigler v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Schmidt v. . ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Simpson v. . Del HoyoNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Aldrich v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.