Meyer v. Burritt
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Suit to foreclose a tax lien; brought to the District Court of Waterbury, and beard before Cowell, J. The Chelsea Savings Bank, one of the defendants, alone made defense. The court granted the foreclosure and the Savings Bank appealed. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtToejrance, J.
This is an action brought to foreclose certain tax-liens claimed to exist in favor of the Town of Waterbury, the City of Waterbury, and the Center School District of Waterbury.
It was first brought in the name of Meyer alone, who is the tax collector for the three communities, who are now joined as plaintiffs. Subsequently, after a demurrer had been filed by the Chelsea Savings Bank, one of the defendants, the court below, on motion of the collector, and against the objection of the bank, admitted the three above named communities as parties plaintiff. In one of the reasons of appeal by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Albany Brewing Co. v. Town of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- Hart v. TiernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sperry v. Butler, TrusteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- F. H. Whittelsey Co. v. Town of Windsor LocksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Phillips v. SturmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Cole v. FrederickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Derby Savings Bank v. KurkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.