Legal Opinion

State v. Purdom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1986No. 52235-9PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodloe, J.

Petitioner Martin J. Purdom appeals his conviction of being an accomplice to the delivery of a controlled substance arguing error occurred by allowing the charge to be amended on the day of trial without granting his request for a continuance and error occurred by the admission of prior consistent statements. We agree, reverse the conviction, and remand for a new trial.

On May 20, 1983, the Grant County Prosecutor charged Purdom with conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance on or about April 27, 1983, in violation of RCW 69.50-.401(a) and RCW 69.50.407. Trial, originally scheduled for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Thomas v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. GosserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. CadenaWashington Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Stephens v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. PelkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API