Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Vacco v. Consalvo

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Dominic R. Massaro, J.

By order to show cause, the Attorney-General has commenced a special proceeding to determine why, pursuant to sections 750 (A) (3) and 751 of the Judiciary Law, Anthony Consalvo should not be adjudged guilty of criminal contempt for having willfully disobeyed a court-ordered mandate. The putative contemnor is so found and adjudged.

Background

Respondent, Anthony Consalvo, is a podiatrist who was registered as a Medicaid provider in New York on December 24, 1985. Under indictment No. 8063/93, he was charged with larceny accomplished through fraudulent…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. United States v. FleischmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Ketchum v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API