Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kaplan v. Simmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 2004Published

1DissentLerner, J.

I respectfully dissent and would reverse the judgment, reinstate the cause of action for lack of informed consent and remand the matter to Supreme Court for trial of this cause of action.

Following a routine mammogram in 1992, plaintiff Sandra Kaplan, M.D. was diagnosed with breast cancer and referred to defendant Michael E Osborne, M.D., who performed a lumpectomy and recommended a course of radiation and chemotherapy. In February of 1995, plaintiff developed a small red “pimple” under her breast, which was later diagnosed by Dr. Osborne’s associate, defendant Rache Simmons, M.D., as a benign…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nieves v. Montefiore Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Romano v. ColenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API