Legal Opinion
Barran v. Nayyar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 1991No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent, who is Hindu, argues that the court erred in ordering that when his son visits him, respondent "shall comply with the ordinance of the Ukrainian Catholic Church in that the child shall attend Mass on Sundays and other Holy Days of Obligation which may occur during visitation.” We disagree. The order did not impermissibly interfere with respondent’s own religious practices (cf., Kadin v Kadin, 131 AD2d 437; see, Matter of Bentley v Bentley, 86 AD2d 926). He does not argue that the order was contrary to the best interest of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Friederwitzer v. FriederwitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bentley v. BentleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Kadin v. KadinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colley v. ColleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Booth v. BoothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Weil v. ClaveringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Orner v. OrnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- E.S. v. P.D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006