Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

E.G. v. C.C.D.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 6, 2010No. 20090101-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION VOROS, Judge:

€ 1 C.C.D. challenges the adoption of Baby Girl, arguing that the district court erred in allowing the adoption without his consent. The adoptive parents defend the district court's order. They contend that C.C.D.'s consent to the adoption was not necessary, because he failed to comply with relevant provisions of the Utah Adoption Act (the Act). We affirm. -

BACKGROUND

12 C.C.D. is the unmarried biological father of Baby Girl. He had a relationship with the birth mother for several months but was not in a relationship with her at the time Baby Girl was born. Three and a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. O'DEA v. OleaUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Hoyle v. MonsonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Brigham City v. StuartUtah Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API