Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Pesterfield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 8, 1960No. 20955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mobley, Justice.

Code § 55-301 provides that the judge of the superior court may appoint a receiver of a fund or of property having no one to manage it. In Parrish v. Rigell, 183 Ga. 218 (188 S. E. 15, 107 A. L. R. 1385), it was held that a cause of action was stated in a petition brought in behalf of an insane person which alleged that the defendant by fraudulent practices had procured a power of attorney from the incompetent and was mismanaging and wasting his property, and which sought the appointment of a temporary and permanent receiver. The court in its ruling stated at page 223: “The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garmany v. LawtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Parrish v. RigellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Monroe Mercantile Co. v. Arnold & McCordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Waycross Military Association v. HiersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Farmers Ginnery & Manufacturing Co. v. ThrasherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Black v. GrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Georgia Casualty and Surety Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1962
  3. Gordon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Codrington)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
  4. Rossville Bank v. Southeast Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Tri-State Broadcasting Co. v. PesterfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API