Farrar v. Pesterfield
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.
Code § 55-301 provides that the judge of the superior court may appoint a receiver of a fund or of property having no one to manage it. In Parrish v. Rigell, 183 Ga. 218 (188 S. E. 15, 107 A. L. R. 1385), it was held that a cause of action was stated in a petition brought in behalf of an insane person which alleged that the defendant by fraudulent practices had procured a power of attorney from the incompetent and was mismanaging and wasting his property, and which sought the appointment of a temporary and permanent receiver. The court in its ruling stated at page 223: “The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Garmany v. LawtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Parrish v. RigellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Monroe Mercantile Co. v. Arnold & McCordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Waycross Military Association v. HiersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Farmers Ginnery & Manufacturing Co. v. ThrasherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Black v. GrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Georgia Casualty and Surety Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1962
- Gordon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Codrington)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
- Rossville Bank v. Southeast Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Tri-State Broadcasting Co. v. PesterfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960