Legal Opinion
In re Cipolla
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 23, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The respondent, Charles W. Cipolla, was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on April 2, 1951. He was also admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New Jersey.
*59On March 6, 1996, the New Jersey Supreme Court reprimanded respondent and ordered that he practice under supervision for one year on the application of the New Jersey Supreme Court Disciplinary Review Board. Respondent was disciplined for acting with conflict of interest, for failing to provide a written retainer agreement, for…
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re DranovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re AnschellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Matter of TejadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026