Legal Opinion

Callahan v. McGoldrick

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

Petitioners seek an order pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act commanding the respondents to pay to each of them annual salary increments not exceeding four in number. All of them have been employed for more than ten years in the ungraded service of the competitive class as court attendants in the City Magistrates’ Court. They base their right to relief on the New York City Administrative Code, section B40-6.0, effective July 1, 1937, of which the relevant portions read as follows:

*574. “Employees: Certain Civil Service: Annual Increment.— a. In each annual expense budget, there shall…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Petrocelli v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Callahan v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Petrocelli v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API