Legal Opinion
State v. Brennan
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 28, 2001PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
780 A.2d 585 (2001)
344 N.J. Super. 136
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
William BRENNAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 11, 2001.
Decided September 28, 2001.
William Brennan, appellant, argued the cause pro se.
Pia S. Perez, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (William H. Schmidt, Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney; Ms. Perez, of counsel and on the brief).
Before Judges PRESSLER, CIANCIA and PARRILLO.
The opinion of the court was delivered by CIANCIA, J.A.D.
Defendant William Brennan was charged with disrupting a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- State v. LashinskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- People v. GalpernNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. JeffersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- State v. CamilloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Tarus v. Borough of Pine HillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Tarus v. Borough of Pine HillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- MORALES v. MAXWELLDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.