Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Town of Forest Park, Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1965No. Civ. 64-89PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHANON, District Judge.

The plaintiff alleges generally that he is a Negro citizen and resident of Oklahoma, that the defendant Town of Forest Park is a corporation under the laws of Oklahoma, and that the individual defendants are the Trustees and Officer? thereof. This action is brought against the defendants under Title 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act), with jurisdiction authorized under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1343, and injunctive relief provided for in Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201.

The plaintiff alleges that he has purchased by written contract from M. N. Brown certain residential real…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Gilfillan's PermitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dowell v. School Board of Oklahoma City Public SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Sheffield Development Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. MacDonald v. Board of Adjustment of the Town of Dewey BeachSuperior Court of Delaware · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API