Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of M.A.H.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 30, 1997No. C0-97-668, C8-97-756PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Two juveniles appeal their delinquency adjudications for disorderly conduct arising from shouting profanities at police officers. We find their speech protected under the First Amendment and therefore reverse.

FACTS

At approximately 9:00 p.m. on December 5, 1996, Duluth police officers Steven Peterson and James Hansen, driving separate squad ears, responded to a call regarding a fight between juveniles with approximately 30 other children watching. Peterson arrived at the scene and was told the fight had broken up at the sound of sirens. Peterson noticed a group of about 20…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Lewis v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Baribeau v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. In the Interest of S.J.N-K.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Baribeau v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
  4. In Re the Welfare of W.A.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. People ex rel. R.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API