Legal Opinion
Seitz v. Envirotech Systems Worldwide Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 19, 2007No. Civil Action H-02-4782PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS FILED BY SKYE AND VALEO
LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
On December 13, 2002, David Seitz and Microtherm, Inc. (together, “Seitz”) sued Envirotech Systems Worldwide, Inc. and Envirotech of Texas (together, “Enviro-tech”) for infringing Seitz’s patents and for unfair competition. (Docket Entry No. 1). Seitz claims that Envirotech’s E SI-2000 water heater and another heater in development, Fortis, infringe the patents. On March 1, 2007, Seitz filed an amended complaint. (Docket Entry No. 136). In that complaint, Seitz added two new defendants,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scott Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Eco Pro Painting, LLC v. Sherwin-Williams Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Bradford Co. v. Afco ManufacturingDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Sensis, Inc. v. The LASIK Vision Institute, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020