Legal Opinion

State v. Fowler

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1988No. 55199PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

Defendant, Jerry Fowler, appeals from his conviction of sodomy following a jury trial. He was sentenced to imprisonment for five years. We affirm.

In his sole point on appeal, defendant claims that pattern instruction MAI-CR3d 320.08.2 is lacking an essential element. Specifically, defendant contends that the instruction is defective because it does not require a finding that the act of deviate sexual intercourse, the essential element of sodomy, be performed with sexual intent.

Defendant’s claim of error was not included in his motion for new trial and, therefore, is not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PrestonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. State v. WaltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. SnyderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. State v. StevensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CarsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. State v. Turner-BeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State v. KeilMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. HarnarMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API