Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Roscommon County Road Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1936No. Docket No. 18, Calendar No. 38,508PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Btjsh:nell, J.

Plaintiffs are some of the owners of properties situated on the west shore of Higgins Lake, which are generally occupied only during the summer months. The principal averments of the bill of complaint are: that defendant, Roscommon county road commission, without proper determination of the necessity therefor or action to acquire title thereto, started a crew of men cutting down trees and clearing a strip of land 66 feet in width along the west shore of the lake and across the lands of plaintiffs and others; the work was commenced notwithstanding the fact that a good gravel road…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Village of Bangor v. Township of BangorMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API