Pride Club, Inc. v. State

I concur in the result only, because of procedural and jurisdictional grounds reported in State v. Kallas,1 cited in the main opinion, but dissent from the rest of the main opinion, which says this case is distinguishable from State By and Through Hansen v. Salt Lake City (Vagabond Club v. Salt Lake City),2 and Salt Lake City v. Wheeler.3 Every case is distinguishable from every other case, but the distinction here is without substance, and the fundamental constitutional principles apply here as well as in those cases. It appears that the main opinion is a commendably persistent effort to…