Legal Opinion

State v. Running Bird

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2002No. 22023PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORS, Acting Justice.

[¶ 1.] Harold Running Bird (Running Bird) appeals a final judgment of conviction for kidnapping and second degree rape. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] In August of 2000, Katinka Stegeman (Katinka) traveled to Rapid City, South Dakota from Holland. She was twenty-four years old, and came to South Dakota to learn more about the Native American culture.

[¶ 3.] On August 13, Katinka went to the Pennington County fairgrounds and met Harold Running Bird (Running Bird) and Edna Eagleman (Edna). The three drank beer together and later went shopping for a sleeping bag and tent…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ReimanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. LogueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. LykkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. OverbeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. MoranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. HaugeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API