State v. Running Bird
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GORS, Acting Justice.
[¶ 1.] Harold Running Bird (Running Bird) appeals a final judgment of conviction for kidnapping and second degree rape. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] In August of 2000, Katinka Stegeman (Katinka) traveled to Rapid City, South Dakota from Holland. She was twenty-four years old, and came to South Dakota to learn more about the Native American culture.
[¶ 3.] On August 13, Katinka went to the Pennington County fairgrounds and met Harold Running Bird (Running Bird) and Edna Eagleman (Edna). The three drank beer together and later went shopping for a sleeping bag and tent…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. ReimanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. LogueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. LykkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. OverbeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MoranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HaugeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.