Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Securities v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 13, 1989No. 88 Civ. 0179 (RWS)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Occidental Petroleum Corporation (“Occidental”), OPCO Acquisition Corporation (“OPCO”) and MidCon Corp. (“MidCon”) have moved pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss the Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) of plaintiffs Metropolitan Securities (“Metropolitan”) and Duncan C. Crawford (“Crawford”) (together “Metropolitan”) for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Alternatively, defendants have moved pursuant to Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(1) to dismiss the Complaint for failure to plead fraud with particularity and for lack of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lorenz v. CSX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- In Re Sahlen & Associates, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- Three Crown Ltd. Partnership v. Caxton Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Landy v. Mitchell Petroleum Technology Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Geren v. Quantum Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.