Legal Opinion

Krystalo Hetelekides, &c. v. County of Ontario

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 2023No. 3Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 3 Krystalo Hetelekides, &c., Appellant, v. County of Ontario et al., Respondents. Mary Jo S. Korona, for appellant. Jason S. DiPonzio, for respondents. Pacific Legal Foundation, amicus curiae RIVERA, J.: Two fundamental legal principles govern our decision in this appeal. First, a tax foreclosure proceeding is in rem against the “res”—the taxable real property—and not an action in personam commenced against an individual to establish personal…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API