Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Almeida

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 20, 1993No. 91-P-671PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Of six points on appeal, the principal one which the defendant Almeida urges is that a special agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), testifying as an expert in photographic analysis, was improperly permitted to speak to an ultimate conclusion that should have been left exclusively to the jury. We think the disputed testimony was rightly received and affirm the judgment of conviction on an indictment for armed robbery while masked (G. L. c. 265, § 17). As to the other five issues, we shall comment briefly.

There had been an armed robbery of a BayBank branch office in New Bedford…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simon v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. DayeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. DockhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. LaCorteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matteo v. LivingstoneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. TeixeiraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API