Legal Opinion

Briden v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 18, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus. Heard on appeal from decision of Superior Court. Appeal dismissed.

1Opinion of the Court

We approve so much of the decision of the Superior Court as holds that the city of Pawtucket has no standing to insist upon the proposed alteration of the bridge in question, for the reason that inasmuch as it is not a statutory duty of the city to make its highways safe and convenient for the passage of electric cars it can have no concern to inquire whether a greater duty is imposed upon the respondent railroad company. If the whole duty of the city in regard to the bridge is imposed upon the railroad company, as is admitted, it has no reason to complain. The question which the board of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of St. Paul v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad v. County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API