Legal Opinion
American Home Fire Assur. Co. v. Juneau Store Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 19, 1935No. Nos. 5387, 5390PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
An elaborate statement of facts is rendered unnecessary because of our conclusion respecting one of appellants’ contentions.
Does the verdict of the jury permit appellee to recover thereon? Stated differ*1002ently, Was the jury’s- verdict inconsistent? The answer to fhis question in appellants’ favor is decisive of the case.
It is appellants’ argument that, where the sworn proof of loss shows an aggregate fire damage of approximately $73,000 and the verdict of the jury fixes the fire loss at $33,000, the jury could not find other than that false and fraudulent proofs of loss…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gerhauser v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1871
- Wunderlich v. Palatine Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Wiesman v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Alfred Hiller Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Meyer v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. B. Cianciolo, Inc., and the Cianciolo Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Gus Lykos v. American Home Insurance Company, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Tenore v. American And Foreign Insurance Company Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Badger Mutual Insurance Company v. Claud B. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Nagel-Taylor Automotive Supplies, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.